Yet another take a look at sex differences in prominent companion attributes: The effects regarding endorsing the standard female gender role
Jost, J. T., and you will Kay, A beneficial. C. (2005). Contact with benevolent sexism and you will subservient gender stereotypes: Effects to own particular and diffuse forms of program excuse. J. People. Soc. Psychol. 88, 498–509. doi: -.step 3.498
Kay, A beneficial. C., Day, Meters. V., Zanna, M. P., and you will Nussbaum, An excellent. D. (2013). The fresh insidious (and you may ironic) effects of positive stereotypes. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 49, 287–291. doi: /j.jesp.
Kervyn, N., Bergsieker, H. B., and Fiske, S. T. (2012). The latest innuendo perception: Reading the good but inferring the new negative. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. forty eight, 77–85. doi: /j.jesp.
Kilianski, S. E., and you will Rudman, L. A. (1998). Looking they both suggests: Do feminine agree out-of benevolent sexism? Sex Roles 39, 333–352.
Mae, L., and you will Carlston, D. Age. (2005). Hoist on your own petard: Whenever prejudiced commentary try acknowledged and you may backfire on speakers. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 41, 240–255. doi: /j.jesp.
Neely, J. H. (1976). Semantic priming and you may retrieval regarding lexical thoughts: Evidence having facilitatory and you can inhibitory processes. Memory Cogn. cuatro, 648–654. doi: /bf03213230
Likeability of address
Scheifele, C., Ehrke, F., Viladot, M. A beneficial., Laar, C. V., and Steffens, M. C. (2020). Investigations the basic socio?architectural assumptions off social term concept on gender perspective: Research from correlational education towards women’s leaders. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 51, e1–e16.
Shelton, J. N., Richeson, J. An excellent., Salvatore, J., and you may Trawalter, S. (2005). Leer más